
In January, the Legislature enacted and Governor Schwarzenegger signed two bills as part of the state's Race to the Top plan. Although California was not among the finalists for the first round of Race to the Top grants, several key provisions of these bills, including those related to meaningful parent engagement in struggling schools and districts, must still be implemented.
As statewide organizations working directly with parents and community members, we understand how critical it is that all stakeholders are recognized as partners in creating and sustaining a vision for their schools. We also know from experience and from decades of research that the most effective parent-engagement strategies are those that are thoughtfully implemented, and that focus on building the knowledge and capacity of parents to be true partners in the education of all students.
With these goals in mind, we share our questions and recommendations regarding key parent-engagement provisions of these new laws as articulated in SB x5 1 and SB x5 4.
Identification of the 5 percent lowest-performing schools and related turnaround work
Given the delay in finalizing the list of California's 5 percent lowest-performing schools, we are deeply concerned about the feasibility of identifying and implementing a sustainable reform strategy prior to September 2010. Included in SB x5 1 is a requirement that parents in schools identified as among the lowest 5 percent be consulted regarding the selection of the most appropriate turnaround strategy, including (but not limited to) a public hearing at each affected school site. We understand the critical importance of making meaningful changes at these schools that result in dramatic and sustained improvements in student achievement. For these changes to occur, the process of selecting and implementing a turnaround strategy must be thoughtful and transparent and must include parents as partners in this effort.
2)
Implementation guidelines for parent empowerment
It is our understanding that the California Department of Education has not yet developed implementation guidelines for the so-called parent-trigger provisions in SB x5 4. As statewide organizations representing 1.3 million families, we have a keen interest in ensuring that the guidelines for the parent trigger are developed in partnership with parent organizations and are clear and uniformly implemented throughout the state. This is particularly important, given recent press reports that groups are already collecting signatures to implement this option.
To that end, we recommend the following:
- The formation of a working group, convened by the California Department of Education, to draft implementation guidelines.
- Among its responsibilities, the group should develop criteria to identify those schools that qualify for a trigger and clarify the process by which signatures must be gathered, including clarity on whether the use of paid signature gatherers is allowable and identifying who is eligible to sign such petitions.
- If, as we believe, the working group determines that existing statutory language provides insufficient guidance to support the development of implementation guidelines, we recommend that clean-up legislation be enacted to clarify outstanding issues.
- As we indicated during the legislative review of SB x5 4, we believe that the most meaningful parent engagement occurs when parents are provided with sufficient information to make informed choices about their children and their schools. To that end, we reiterate our belief that the parent-trigger provision would be significantly strengthened by the annual publication of a list of all schools in the state eligible for the parent trigger. For those eligible school communities expressing interest in exploring this option, public meetings should be held at the affected school site informing parents of the petition option and providing information about the allowable turnaround strategies that can be triggered by a successful petition campaign. We would further recommend that all petitions include information about the group or groups supporting a petition to implement the parent trigger.
3)
Open-enrollment provisions As with the parent-trigger provisions in SB x5 4, we recommend an inclusive and transparent process for developing the implementation guidelines of the recently enacted open-enrollment option. Of particular concern is the potential for certain groups of students, such as English-language learners or students with special needs, to be denied access to this option by districts simply declaring they do not have the capacity to accept them. Further, because the final legislation left open the question of how transportation to a new district would be paid for, we remain concerned about the potential of this provision to siphon much-needed funding out of school districts that are struggling to improve, despite repeated budget cuts.
We would value the opportunity to meet with you and your staff to discuss these concerns and to work together to create and implement policies that provide for meaningful and ongoing participation of parents that results in significant and lasting improvements in achievement for all of California's students.
Thank you for your work on behalf of California's children and for your prompt attention to these issues.
Sincerely,
Debbie Look
Director of Legislation
California State PTA
Education Organizing and Policy Director
Director of Legislative and Community Affairs
About the California State PTA
The California State PTA (www.capta.org) has nearly 1 million members throughout the state working on behalf of public schools, children and families, with the motto, "Every child, one voice." The PTA is the nation's oldest, largest and highest profile volunteer organization working to improve the education, health and welfare of all children and youth. The PTA also advocates at national, state and local levels for education and family issues. The PTA is nonprofit, nonsectarian and noncommercial.
About PICO
PICO California (www.picocalifornia.org) is part of the PICO National Network of faith-based community organizations. In California, we are comprised of 20 community organizations representing 350 congregations and 450,000 families. PICO works to create innovative solutions to pressing community issues and to build a legacy of leadership in communities throughout California and the nation.
About Public Advocates
Public Advocates (www.publicadvocates.org) Public Advocates Inc. is a non-profit law firm and advocacy organization that challenges the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing and transit equity.